Stay Clear of ZM Stock Until It Gives Back a Lot More Ground

On Sept. 1, Zoom Video (NASDAQ:ZM) stock was executing a “dead cat bounce.” As in, even a dead cat will bounce if thrown from high enough up.

After reporting “disappointing” results, net income of $317 million, $1.04 per share, on revenue of $1.02 billion, up 54% year over year, the stock tanked.

ZM dropped nearly $60 per share at the August 31 open, closing at $289.50. Analysts had been expecting profits of $1.16 per share, although they underestimated the revenue bump.

The bounce came in overnight. ZM stock trades now at about $295. Zoom’s market cap is now about $89 billion, on estimated fiscal 2022 revenue of $4 billion. It’s still an expensive stock.

Analysts were left flat-footed by the reaction to the numbers, like guards tracking Trae Young. At first glance the numbers looked fabulous. We’re talking here of growth at over 50% per year, and 30% of revenue hitting the net income line.

At the time of earnings, none of the 21 analysts following ZM at Tipranks were saying sell. In June, with Zoom at $320 per share, at least two were saying that. One genius, claiming to be a hold, said on TV he was looking to the stock trading at $365 per share after earnings.

Even before the earnings “shock,” Zoom stock was up just 6% on the year. It was a huge winner from the pandemic. Imagine, a free, easy-to-operate video conferencing system anyone could use on a whim. ZM stock peaked at $560 per share early this year, and analysts were still screaming buy. Those who listened have lost nearly half their money.

I wrote about the stock’s stagnation and the reasons for it in June. Zoom’s success had Cloud Czars Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) and Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG) intent on the space. If someone “schedules a Zoom” with you right now, using Gmail, Google software will redirect you to its own conferencing service.

Then there’s Cisco Systems (NASDAQ:CSCO), which invented the space in the 2000s.

A Closer Look at ZM Stock

Zoom has responded to competition by expanding its niche. Zoom now has an API so its services can be integrated directly into other software.

It has a Zoom Events service that tries to replicate live trade events. There’s an Immersive View feature that makes online meetings look more like offline ones. It’s a complete platform that is competitive with other offerings.

These are good things, but even Zoom executives admit they face headwinds with the economic reopening. They also face deep-pocketed competitors with the cash to buy market share.

Might one of them buy Zoom? Zoom might look nice inside Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL). FaceTime was kept inside the Apple walled garden. Apple might find Zoom a good way to break out of the garden and attract more enterprise customers.

Don’t hold your breath on that.

The Bottom Line

Expectations for ZM stock have yet to bottom out.

Over the next few weeks, I expect several analysts to put out “sell” notes on Zoom Video and talk about how they expected what just happened. I’d prefer them to just say they goofed. If an old reporter with a web browser could see problems back in June, the sharpies have no excuse.

That still leads to the question, when do you get back in? Zoom is still growing fast. It’s still enormously profitable. The global pandemic is still raging. Its brand name is part of the language.

Analysts are expecting revenue of $4.84 billion for the 2023 fiscal year, which starts in February. I’d pay $250 per share, but no more.

On the date of publication, Dana Blankenhorn held long positions in AAPL and MSFT. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the writer, subject to the InvestorPlace.com Publishing Guidelines.

Dana Blankenhorn has been a financial and technology journalist since 1978. He is the author of Living With Moore’s Law: Past, Present and Future available at the Amazon Kindle store. Write him at danablankenhorn@gmail.com or tweet him at @danablankenhorn. He writes a Substack newsletter, Facing the Future, which covers technology, markets, and politics.

Source link

NVDA Stock Is Finally Showing Signs of Fatigue After Its Big Rally

Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) stoc has pulled back from the all-time highs after a red-hot run post-earnings.

NVDA stock traded just past the $230 level before ultimately losing momentum.

Certainly, some of the rally was warranted given the earnings beat and dovish Fed speak from Jackson Hole.

The relentless rally has now come too far, too fast. Time to be a seller of NVDA on any further move higher. Earnings were released on August 18.

Nvidia beat on both the top and bottom line with revenues of $6.51 billion and EPS of $1.04 just beating estimates of $6.33 billion and $1.01. The company also guided higher as chip demand remains strong in the face of limited supply.

Earnings and revenue will likely remain strong for the next few quarters. They had better given the historically rich valuations for NVDA stock.

The current P/S ratio now stands at just over 26x. This represents by far the loftiest multiple in the past decade.

It is even more astounding considering that NVDA stock is now the eighth largest U.S stock by market cap. It will be difficult to continue to grow at the same pace given the current $557 billion dollar market cap simply due to the sheer size of Nvidia.

Trees don’t grow to the sky forever.

Technical Take on NVDA Stock

Nvidia shares reached overbought readings on Aug. 31 before finally weakening.

Nine-day RSI breached the 70 level but broke back below. Momentum also got to an extreme before softening. MACD topped out near the highest levels of the past year. NVDA is trading at a big premium to the 20-day moving average.

The last four times these indicators aligned in a similar fashion marked significant short-term tops in NVDA stock, as highlighted in the chart.

Shares subsequently pulled back to and through the 20-day moving average. Look for the same price action once again in Nvidia.

I didn’t always have a bearish opinion regarding NVDA stock. My previous article from July 23 had a decidedly bullish tone. Nvidia was trading at the $195 area at the time and I recommended selling an out-of-the-money August bull put spread.

This proved to be profitable. NVDA stock is up almost 15% from that time and my opinion has changed because price does matter.

So to position for a pullback or at least a period of consolidation, an out-of-the-money bear call spread makes probabilistic sense.

Shorting NVDA stock outright is both expensive from a margin standpoint and risky. Selling an out-of-the-money defined risk spread provides a solid return while still having a built-in cushion to have NVDA stock move against you. Both of these are critical components in this overall market environment.

How To Trade It

Sell NVDA Oct $245/$247.50 call spread for a 45 cents net credit.

The maximum gain on the trade is $45 per spread. The maximum risk is $205 per spread. Return on risk is 21.95% for the 45 day holding period (roughly 400% annualized).

Earnings are due on Nov. 17. The spread will expire well before then to avoid any earnings-related risk. The short $245 strike provides a 9.45% upside cushion to the $223.85 closing price for NVDA stock. It is also well above the all-time closing high of $226.88.

On the date of publication, Tim Biggam did not have (either directly or indirectly) any positions in the securities mentioned in this article. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the writer, subject to the InvestorPlace.com Publishing Guidelines.

Tim spent 13 years as Chief Options Strategist at Man Securities in Chicago, 4 years as Lead Options Strategist at ThinkorSwim and 3 years as a Market Maker for First Options in Chicago. Tim has appeared on PBS and the Nightly Business report, while maintaining weekly appearance on Bloomberg TV and CBOE-TV to discuss everything from volatility to LEAPs. Tim has also been invited for reoccurring appearances on CNBC’s Volatility Playbook.

Source link

HOOD Stock Continues To Disappoint as It Risks Becoming Generic

Since before Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD) stock went public a month ago, the phrase “Robinhood stock” has been part of the vocabulary.

These are stocks beloved of small investors, who often trade on Robinhood’s app and exchange views on Reddit’s r/Wallstreetbets.

But after looking at its June quarter earnings report and what has happened since, the ultimate Robinhood stock may be Robinhood itself.

Robinhood has everything a “bro trader,” a 30-something guy with cash who treats the stock market as a casino, might want. It has volatility. It has crypto. All it lacks are profits or revenue that can possibly justify a $37 billion market cap.

Hood stock shot out of the gates like Secretariat, shares hitting $70 on August 4. It trades today at about a little below $45.

The mobile Robinhood app moves markets because its users imitate hedge funds, ganging up on specific stocks. These are the folks behind Gamestop (NYSE:GME), AMC Entertainment (NYSE:AMC) and other money-losers.

A Closer Look at Hood Stock

Shorts were squeezed and fortunes made in days of frenzied trade. Those who get out at the top make fortunes. Those who don’t are left holding garbage.

That’s something the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is worried about. If a broker gives you a rosy projection that turns out to be phony, they can be sued. How do you know that dude on Wallstreetbets isn’t just engaged in market manipulation?

Then there’s “payment for order flow, (PFOF)” the one weird trick Robinhood uses to make trading free.

Robinhood collects PFOF from brokers who execute its trades. Without it, Robinhood would have to charge you. PFOF is behind other retail brokers, like Charles Schwab (NASDAQ:SCHW), eliminating trading fees, too.

The idea the SEC considers eliminating PFOF “on the table” should rattle Robinhood stockholders.

The Posse Is Coming

What concerned me in the second-quarter report wasn’t Robinhood’s admission that trading was slowing. It does that every summer.

What concerned me was that half its trading revenue, $233 million, came from handling cryptocurrency. A fall in that market could wreck HOOD stock.

Also, competitors can copy its features, and that’s a bigger worry. Paypal (NASDAQ:PYPL) is looking into it. SoFi (NASDAQ:SOFI) is already doing it.

Once stock trading is an Application Program Interface (API) any company can do it. Betting that Robinhood can dramatically expand its user base purely on its brand name may not be a good bet.

Robinhood is trying to stay ahead of the game. It bought Say Technologies for $140 million last month. The idea is to improve communication between small shareholders and the companies they invest in.

I’m just not convinced the “bros” sending stocks “to the Moon” care to communicate. They all think they’re Blofeld-level Bond villians. They don’t want companies to talk, they want them to die.

The Bottom Line

TV analyst Jim Cramer pounded the table for Robinhood as it came public.

The timing of that call was lousy. It was Didi Global (NYSE:DIDI) lousy. Maybe Cathie Woods’ recent call, buying Robinhood on its dip, makes more sense. She’s buying to make it available to her ETF investors. Whether it rises or falls the dealer gets her cut.

My personal “bookie” is Schwab, up 38% so far in 2021. Their scaled systems give them a lot more technology debt than Robinhood. They also have $57 billion in cash with which to evolve their systems and deal with regulators.

Robinhood stock is for bros who like action. It’s for young traders looking for things to go “to the Moon,” fundamentals be damned. As an investor, I prefer Schwab.

On the date of publication, Dana Blankenhorn held no positions in companies mentioned in this article. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the writer, subject to the InvestorPlace.com Publishing Guidelines.

Dana Blankenhorn has been a financial and technology journalist since 1978. He is the author of Living With Moore’s Law: Past, Present and Future available at the Amazon Kindle store. Write him at danablankenhorn@gmail.com or tweet him at @danablankenhorn. He writes a Substack newsletter, Facing the Future, which covers technology, markets, and politics.

Source link

NVAX Stock Is a Steal Here If You Believe It Will Come Through

Novavax (NASDAQ:NVAX) stock could trade in the $100 billion market capitalization range like BioNTech (NASDAQ:BNTX) or Moderna (NASDAQ:MRNA). Except, unlike those companies, Novavax has not yet delivered.

It might be among the most-watched firms that did not yet bring a Covid-19 vaccine to market.

Chances are low that it will slump like Altimmune (NASDAQ:ALT) after it discontinued its nasal Covid-19 vaccine.

By comparison, Inovio Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:INO) is on the mend after Brazil approved its vaccine candidate.

If Novavax can get its act together soon, it could take the kind of ride that makes people wish they had gotten in sooner. Let’s take a closer look.

Approval to Lift NVAX Stock

A European Union official told Reuters that the bloc expects Novavax will submit key data soon. It needs to complete the submission of the data to the European Medicines Agency before it can get Europe’s approval.

According to the EU official, this might happen by the end of September. Once it does, Novavax may fulfill its deal to supply up to 200 million doses.

The official spoke under the condition of anonymity. Novavax did not offer any hints on its timeline nor did it explain the reasons for delays in supplying the data.

The longer it takes to ship a product, the more market share it loses to other vaccine suppliers. The EU official said a decision on the vaccine approval was still possible this year, “as long as there are no more delays.”

Big Loss in Q2

In the second quarter, Novavax’s revenue grew by 738.5% to $298.02 million. It lost $4.75 a share on a GAAP basis.

The big loss is immaterial because markets are valuing the company based on its vaccine sales. The company claimed it is on track to achieve 100 million monthly doses by the end of the third quarter. By the end of Q4, it will supply 150 million doses.

“Our clinical successes over the second quarter reaffirm our confidence in NVX-CoV2373’s differentiated efficacy profile,” said Novavax President and Chief Executive Officer Stanley C. Erck.

His confidence suggests that the company will not post any disappointments in its clinical study results.

“We continue to see the circulation of new variants and inequitable access to vaccine globally,” he added.

Even though Novavax is the latest in bringing a vaccine to the market, the recurring demand will sustain shipment volumes. Not only will countries need the vaccine for booster shots but variants of concern could require vaccinations twice a year.

Opportunity

Moderna and BioNTech demonstrated strong initial protection against the variant but it is not 100%.

Countries will want another vaccine offering lower hospitalization rates from the delta variant. Novavax has the World Health Organization’s support.

On Aug. 5, it filed a EUA to regulatory agencies in Indonesia and the Philippines. Novavax said it would file for WHO emergency use next.

Novavax’s manufacturing capabilities are ready to fulfill vaccine orders once it receives regulatory approval.

It also has Japan as one of its customers ready to take delivery. In February, Novavax and Takeda (NYSE:TAK) finalized a licensing agreement. Takeda will develop, manufacture, and commercialize Novavax’s NVX-CoV2373 vaccine candidate.

Valuation

Moderna and BioNtech’s multi-bagger returns in the last year suggest that NVAX stock has more room to run higher.

Markets will pay a rich valuation for NVAX sstock. In May, Novavax’s FDA approval delay sent the stock to $120. Within weeks, bullish investors quickly scooped up shares.

On Wall Street, four analysts offer a one-year price target on Novavax. The average price target is around $277, according to tipranks. The target range is between $235 and $305.

Investors are better off accumulating NVAX stock than on speculating on Inovio or Altimmune.

Novavax ended the second quarter with $807 million in cash. Its cash position grew to $1.1 billion due to payments from advanced purchase agreements.

The strong balance sheet will fund Novavax’s operational costs. Conversely, the smaller biotech firms face constant cash flow challenges. They need to raise cash, often from selling shares, to fund research activities.

Few investors stayed the course holding BNTX and MRNA. Those who missed out on the gain may consider NVAX stock from here.

The market is not yet saturated with Covid vaccine suppliers, and so far the market is confident that Novavax will become the next major vaccine supplier globally.

On the date of publication, Chris Lau did not have (either directly or indirectly) any positions in the securities mentioned in this article. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the writer, subject to the InvestorPlace.com Publishing Guidelines.

Chris Lau is a contributing author for InvestorPlace.com and numerous other financial sites. Chris has over 20 years of investing experience in the stock market and runs the Do-It-Yourself Value Investing Marketplace on Seeking Alpha. He shares his stock picks so readers get original insight that helps improve investment returns.

Source link

BABA Stock Is Ready for a Bounce After Getting Staight with Beijing

Timing a market bottom is a notoriously difficult thing to do. So, I won’t claim that now is the definitive time to invest in Alibaba (NYSE:BABA) stock.

However, pundits have to admit that the case for maximizing returns by buying low looks very near. 

The truth is that Alibaba was never likely in any jeopardy of being broken up by the Chinese government. Many commenters and writers have continually banged the drum that BABA stock will rebound since its woes began late last year. 

The latest news that Alibaba is investing in President Xi Jinping’s initiatives should lessen any remaining doubt about its trajectory: Alibaba is rising again, making BABA stock easy pickings.

Common Prosperity and BABA Stock

An Aug. 17 speech by Chinese President Xi Jinping has resonated across the country’s economy. The speech focused on common prosperity and a rational adjustment of excessive incomes. It was aimed at the redistribution of wealth in which higher-income individuals and companies contribute more to society. 

China’s tech giants and leading companies spanning industry have clearly understood its import, and are toeing the line. 

Alibaba has pledged to invest $15.5 billion in Xi’s initiative by 2025(1). Beijing is proving that it wields a firm hand over its economy. While that may have appeared to be less the case a year ago, the case is clarifying: The Chinese economy has strong capitalist tendencies but Beijing runs the show.

I’m not here to argue that vis-a-vis the U.S. approach, simply to note that Alibaba is playing the game and won’t be going anywhere anytime soon. 

Where Will the Money Go?

Zhejiang News, a Beijing-backed website, says the money will go towards subsidies for small and medium enterprises and improving insurance protection for gig-economy workers. 

Alibaba will also be setting up a $3.1 billion common prosperity development fund. There are investors who will despise the moves and the broader implications, but this is the game. 

In fact, Alibaba is simply one among many Chinese companies which is stepping in line with the Beijing dictate.

Tencent made a similar 100 million yuan ($15.5 billion) fund. It is no surprise that two of China’s biggest tech firms that gobbled up startups last year are stepping in line this year. The Chinese government is stern and powerful, as both have clearly seen. 

Pinduoduo (NASDAQ:PDD) recently hit a milestone, posting its first quarterly profit since listing back in 2018. It will donate all $374 million to support agriculture and rural development.

Pinduoduo has also pledged to do the same with up to its next 10 billion yuan ($1.5 billion) in profits. 

Although Alibaba looks to be clear of Beijing’s heavy hand, all of this does leave Alibaba investors in a precarious position. 

Blunted Future?

The broader picture is that Alibaba will give away as much as $20 billion in support of President Xi’s ‘Common Prosperity’ initiative between now and 2025. 

On the one hand, Alibaba is doing what it must in the face of Beijing’s might. Therefore, it should rise. The move is a clear sign that its prospects should be immediately improved. 

But on the other hand, it is problematic. The optics of the common prosperity initiative and the response of Chinese companies raise serious questions. Who’s to say that Alibaba won’t be squeezed again in the future? How much will those billions in donations affect the company? 

While I think BABA stock is investment worthy now, I would caveat that the situation bears serious scrutiny. I would invest now, but withdraw if a similar situation crops up. 

Alibaba’s profits increased 22% in the last quarter and it has Beijing behind it. It should rise. If that is fine for you as an investor, there’s money to be gained.

On the date of publication, Alex Sirois did not have (either directly or indirectly) any positions in the securities mentioned in this article. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the writer, subject to the InvestorPlace.com Publishing Guidelines.

Alex Sirois is a freelance contributor to InvestorPlace whose personal stock investing style is focused on long-term, buy-and-hold, wealth-building stock picks. Having worked in several industries from e-commerce to translation to education and utilizing his MBA from George Washington University, he brings a diverse set of skills through which he filters his writing.”

Source link

Fraud Allegations Are Unlikely to Keep SAVA Stock Down

Allegations of fraud against Cassava Sciences (NASDAQ:SAVA) are unlikely to stop its Alzheimer’s drug candidate from quickly advancing to a Phase 3 clinical trial. As a result, I remain very bullish on SAVA stock.

One of the most important reasons is an issue that hasn’t been explored very much yet. Specifically, none of the allegations against Cassava relates directly to the most recent safety and cognition data on its Alzheimer candidate, simufilam.

That safety and cognition data, released on July 29, was incredibly positive, as simufilam did not cause any major adverse side effect, and apparently became the first drug to improve Alzheimer’s patients’ cognition levels after nine months.

Vigorously Debating the Trees and Ignoring the Forest

The Citizen’s Petition to the FDA that started this controversy was submitted by attorney Jordan Thomas and published on Aug. 22. Basically, it focuses on using technical analysis to question the integrity of studies carried out in the lab of an associate (but not an employee) of Cassava, Dr. Hoau-Yan Wang, who is a professor at City University of New York. Wang serves on the company’s scientific advisory board.

Dr. Lindsay Burns, Cassava’s vice president for neuroscience, co-authored several papers that were based on the data whose integrity is questioned by the petition.

Thomas also claims that Cassava has been using brains that were too old to test its drug and that only Wang’s lab has reported a connection between the protein that simufilam affects and Alzheimer’s.

Assessing the merit of the technical accusations is way beyond my expertise. But gauging the likely impact of those accusations on SAVA stock is well within my purview.

And, as I indicated earlier, I think, while so many have focused on debating the merits of Thomas’ accusations, nearly everyone is ignoring a crucial point: There appears to have been no credible accusations against the safety and cognition data that Cassava unveiled on July 29.

What’s more, Thomas’ accusations primarily relate to the measurement of biomarkers used to determine the presence of proteins associated with Alzheimer’s in patients’ brains. Yet, for Phase 2B data reported by the company, an independent company, Quanterix (NASDAQ:QTRX), assessed the biomarkers, according to Cassava. Quanterix has not denied that assertion. And no one, as far as I’ve seen, has contested the accuracy of the cognition and safety data released on July 29.

Moreover, no independent expert that I’ve seen has corroborated Thomas’ points about using brains that are too old, and, as I noted, Quanterix has confirmed Cassava’s biomarker data. As a result, the only arguments Thomas makes that seem valid are his attacks on the integrity of Wang’s experiments.

So, while many people are debating the trees (the charges regarding the integrity of Cassava’s old papers), nobody appears to have realized that the forest (the company’s great, undisputed safety and cognition data) is hundreds of time more important.

The Impact on the Alzheimer’s Treatment

I would not rule out the possibility that most of Thomas’ charges about Wang’s lab are true. After all, multiple experts who claim to be free from any conflicts of interest say that the allegations have merit.

Thomas asks the FDA to “halt” upcoming Phase 3 trial of simufilam and conduct audits of multiple aspects of Cassava’s prior work. That would delay the drug’s availability for years, potentially costing millions of Alzheimer’s sufferers a year or two of much better quality of life.

I’m not surprised that Thomas is making these arguments. Someone is obviously paying him to try to derail Cassava’s drug, and lawyers are trained to find the best available arguments that support their missions.

Also, our legal system embraces the idea of ignoring crucial evidence because the person or people who provided that evidence did something improper. For example, evidence in a criminal investigation that’s obtained illegally is sometimes ruled inadmissible in courts, at times ruining prosecutors’ entire cases and allowing obviously guilty people to go free. And if a trial witness is found to have lied about one issue or done something wrong in the past, opposing lawyers argue that everything he or she says is worthless.

But should we use the same principle when it comes to drugs that could save or greatly improve the lives of literally millions of people? Taken to its logical extreme, that concept is totally ridiculous and very dangerous.

For example, what if we somehow found out now that data from the early studies of a drug that’s greatly prolonging the lives of AIDS patients was falsified? Should we recall the drug until all of the studies on it can be audited, potentially condemning tens of thousands of people to much earlier deaths and much greater suffering? Or should we rely on all the subsequent evidence we obtained that the drug is safe and effective and keep prescribing the drug? I think the answer is pretty obvious.

Likewise, the idea of potentially causing hundreds of thousands of Alzheimer’s patients to suffer needlessly because a professor may have faked some data in early tests should be viewed as an idea that violates common sense.

Other Important Points

As many others have pointed out, the FDA quite correctly appears to be moving ahead with the Phase 3 trial of Cassava’s simufilam, despite Thomas’ petition. The agency did, after all, issue the protocols for the Phase 3 trial several days after receiving Thomas’ petition.

Also importantly (and I haven’t seen anyone else point this out), just because Burns authored or co-authored papers about the data generated by Wang’s lab does not mean that she was closely involved with or even knew about any improper activities that may have gone on there. I highly doubt whether she spent much time at the lab carrying out experiments.

Also worth noting is that Dr. Nadav Friedmann, Cassava’s chief medical officer, and Dr, James Kupiec, its chief clinical development officer, both appear to be Burns’ supervisors. Both spent many years working in responsible positions for large, well-known pharmaceutical companies. Friedmann was CEO of Daiichi Pharmaceutical Corporation (OTC:DSNKY) and Kupiec was a vice president for Pfizer (NYSE:PFE).

The Bottom Line on SAVA Stock

Fraud that may or may not have been committed at Wang’s lab will not be allowed to invalidate the unchallenged safety and cognition results of Cassava’s recent study or delay its upcoming Phase 3 trial. Therefore, long-term investors should buy SAVA stock on its current weakness.

On the date of publication, Larry Ramer held a long position in SAVA stock. 

Source link

3 Energy Stocks Popping with Oil: XLE, COP, HES

Oil prices pushed past $70 for the first time in a month in late-day trading Thursday. The rally is breathing new life into the energy sector, which is up 2.5% at this writing. For the past quarter, energy stocks have been lagging the broader market, so shareholders are cheering the newfound strength. To celebrate the potential breakout, I’m highlighting the best three energy stocks to buy.

My process for finding today’s targets was simple. First, I sorted a list of the most liquid oil-related stocks by percentage change and focused on the biggest gainers. Second, I reviewed the chart of each to settle on the cleanest patterns. Despite today’s jump, many remain in downtrends and still need time to set up a trading opportunity properly.

To round out the trio, I included a sector fund to provide a diversified way to play.

  • Energy Sector Select SPDR Fund (NYSEARCA:XLE)
  • Conoco Phillips (NYSE:COP)
  • Hess Corp (NYSE:HES)

After performing technical analysis on each chart, I’ll build out a smart options trade to profit.

Energy Stocks to Buy: Energy Sector Select SPDR Fund (XLE)

Energy Sector (XLE) chart with higher pivot low

Source: The thinkorswim® platform from TD Ameritrade

While XLE may not be ready for a directional trade due to the multiple overhead resistance zones, it does appear stable enough to warrant a cash flow play. I’m thinking naked puts. Thursday’s climb created a higher pivot low for the fund. As a bonus, we bounced right at the rising 200-day moving average. You’ll recall that higher pivots denote increasing demand.

The 50-day moving average and old resistance zones loom overhead and need to be taken out before the trend fully turns higher. In the meantime, I think today’s jump gives the green light to at least selling out-of-the-money puts.

The Trade: Sell the Oct $44 put for 60 cents.

Consider it a bet that XLE stays above $44 for the next 43 days. If it does, then you’ll pocket the max gain of $60 per contract.

Conoco Phillips (COP)

Conoco Phillips (COP) stock chart with potential bullish breakout

Source: The thinkorswim® platform from TD Ameritrade

Conoco Phillips has the best-looking chart of all the largest players. It is, therefore, my stock of choice if you want a lower volatility play. My analysis for COP stock mirrors XLE. The higher pivot low just formed gives bulls a slight edge, but major resistance at the 50-day moving average and the cluster of swing highs near $57.50 require keeping our optimism in check.

You could wait for a breakout, then go directional with a call spread. Or, sell naked puts or put spreads now as a wager that prices will at least hold steady for the next few weeks. To give a bit of variety to today’s trade ideas, let’s build out a call spread. Be sure to wait until COP stock rises beyond $57.50 before pulling the trigger.

The Trade: Buy the Nov $57.50/$62.50 bull call for around $1.70.

Hess Corp (HES)

Hess Corp (HES) stock chart with resistance break.

Source: The thinkorswim® platform from TD Ameritrade

The final of today’s energy stocks provides the most volatile option. This can be both a boon and a curse, but I’m banking on it, working to our advantage if oil prices continue to rise. Thursday was a victory for HES stock in two ways. First, it pushed above its 20-day and 200-day moving averages. Second, it also breached the previous pivot high to signal a potential change in trend. Couple these with the trio of accumulation days that accompanied its mid-August upswing, and you could make the case that the bottom is in.

Let’s go with a bull put spread to bank on the juicier premiums available in HES options. The following bet will payout as Hess shares sit above $62.50 at expiration.

The Trade: Sell the Oct $62.50/$57.50 bull put spread for 50 cents.

On the date of publication, Tyler Craig was LONG XLE. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the writer, subject to the InvestorPlace.com Publishing Guidelines.

For a free trial to the best trading community on the planet and Tyler’s current home, click here!

Source link

DKNG Stock: DraftKings Is A Buy Before The Football Season

A leader in the online sports gambling industry, DraftKings (NASDAQ:DKNG) is expanding its presence across the States and is expected to benefit from the upcoming football season. The company is making well-timed moves to build new offerings and achieve growth. It has successfully partnered with some of the top sports companies to offer a unique experience to the users. DKNG stock is up 22% over the month and is trading close to $60 today.

The stock recorded an all-time high of $74 and the current dip is a great buying opportunity. DraftKings reported strong Q2 numbers and is one of the most valuable companies in the industry with a valuation of $23.9 billion. With that in mind, let’s take a look at my bullish thesis of DKNG stock.

 

The Football Season Is Huge

There is nothing as big as football in the USA and I believe the National Football League (NFL) season will give it a strong boost. The company already has more than 1.1 million monthly unique players and it will be able to attract users during the football fiesta. The company stated that it does not expect any slowdown in the coming months which shows that it is ready to make the most of this season.

DraftKings entered into an agreement with Genius Sports to provide the complete range of official sportsbook data in addition to the complete suite of NFL products. 

In April, the company was chosen as one of the NFL’s tri-exclusive sports betting partners and this is when Genius Sports become the exclusive distributor of the official statistics and sports betting data feed. This makes DKNG one of the first operators that have a full Genius Sports NFL offering including the pre and in-game engagement.

This allows DKNG users to wager on the competitions, thus, enforcing the position of the business as the top provider of live betting products. 

DraftKings recently entered into an agreement with Simplebet, which is a tech company that allows micro-betting. As per the deal, Simplebet will offer its products to the users of DraftKings for NFL, Major League Baseball, and other college football contests. This deal will strengthen the offerings of DKNG and will make it an ideal choice for die-hard sports gamblers. 

Growing National Expansion

DraftKings is constantly expanding its presence across different states and it recently went live in Arizona, making it the 44th state to offer Daily Fantasy Sports. This is the perfect time to launch DraftKings in Arizona as the sports season is set to begin. It will be the most beneficial time for the company to acquire new users and grow its presence.

The company is offering a pre-registration bonus to attract users to the platform. 

DraftKings is heavily invested in expansion and as states legalize online betting, it is not wasting any time in expanding  across the country. 

The only states where betting is prohibited now are Hawaii, Alabama, Louisiana, Idaho, Montana, Iowa, Washington, and Nevada.

 

The Bottom Line On DKNG Stock

I am very bullish on DKNG stock and believe it is for the long term. The company has made some strong partnerships in the industry and is one of the top players today. As the lockdown ends and we resume normalcy, the company will gain from the sports season and it will take DKNG stock higher.

The fundamentals of the company are strong and its user growth is impressive. Cathie Wood bought $60 million worth of DKNG stock recently which has led the stock higher. 

I believe any dip in DKNG stock is a great buying opportunity. The company will report impressive revenue numbers in the coming quarter and it will benefit investors.

On the date of publication, Vandita Jadeja did not have (either directly or indirectly) any positions in the securities mentioned in this article. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the writer, subject to the InvestorPlace.com Publishing Guidelines.

Source link

Can Speculators Trust the Latest Swing Up in SKLZ Stock?

Although special purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs, gained notoriety over the trailing year-and-a-half period, they do offer a clear advantage to retail investors. Without these blank-check firms, regular folks may not have a chance to buy names like Skillz (NYSE:SKLZ) stock.

That’s because traditional market debuts are comparatively onerous, perhaps enough so to prevent SKLZ stock from even existing.

But then again, isn’t that the point of an initial public offering? If any business could offer their equity shares to the wider investment community, more enterprises would do exactly that. Part of the job description for the Securities and Exchange Commission is really to cut down on the number of garbage plays that make to the major exchanges.

Now, I’m not suggesting that SKLZ stock is a throwaway trade. However, I think it’s fair to point out that any company that enters the market via a SPAC merger should be viewed with a tad more skepticism than a regular IPO.

It’s really the difference between buying a used car from that manufacturer’s original dealership as opposed to purchasing from some random person on the internet. Yes, going through the automaker’s dealership is a costly process, but the company will stand by its product.

But with a second-hand transaction through a private party? Caveat emptor, as everyone likes to say. But it raises the follow-up question: why should SKLZ stock or any SPAC-based IPO be any different?

In life as in the markets, there’s usually a reason why something is the way that it is. For companies that entered the public arena via SPAC mergers like Skillz did, you might be buying someone else’s problem. Honestly, if a company had the time, resources and confidence in going public the straightforward way – and not through the back door like SPACs – it would probably do so nine times out of 10.

The Credibility Issue Still Hurts SKLZ Stock

I have a tendency of overexplaining certain concepts so I’m grateful for my colleagues who have skills in succinct explanations. One such person is Dana Blankenhorn, who gave the explanation of the underlying business of SKLZ stock as follows:

Skillz is a game platform. It lets developers create online card games, board games, shooter games and adventure games. The idea is that companies can “gamify” any intellectual property, put it on an online platform, and make money from it with cash prizes and entry fees.

Skillz launched in 2012 for Android and, later, iOS. Much of its work is with sports teams, and it got heavy venture backing.

Because of this gamification potential, Skillz can expand into multiple arenas – and of course, it’s not waiting for anyone’s invitation. For example, Skillz inked a collaboration with the NFL to promote various football-themed digital competitions. Therefore, it’s not the narrative that the bears are challenging SKLZ stock on.

Instead, it’s the credibility of said narrative. As Blankenhorn noted bluntly, “A friend who got into e-sports over a decade ago showed me that sport franchises are often led by dumb, lazy people who expect money without effort.”

Further, he stated that “Unless there is someone inside the NFL working hard on this, I wouldn’t expect anything to come from it. Previous Skillz deals with basketball teams haven’t made the cash register ring or done much for SKLZ stock.”

Exactly. While I’m not going to make a mountain out of a molehill, the reality is that Skillz’s most recent quarterly update for the three months ended June 30 was eyebrow-raising. Losing monthly active users and pinging a slight loss on average revenue per paying user does not provide encouragement.

Expect More, Pay Less

To be clear, it’s not so much that the second-quarter report was poor per say. It’s just that the company should have done more given how the backdrop is more favorable to SKLZ stock.

Since we’re talking about the NFL, there should be brewing excitement that at least for sports leagues, things are going to return more or less back to the old normal. Great! Shouldn’t that result in higher upticks across Skillz’s key metrics?

In my assessment, the fact that SKLZ stock has been all over the map during the past few months indicates wide uncertainty about the underlying company. To repeat the car analogy, no one really knows what’s underneath the hood because no one wants to certify it.

That’s a sign to sit on the sidelines until the price in SKLZ stock justifies the risk.

On the date of publication, Josh Enomoto did not have (either directly or indirectly) any positions in the securities mentioned in this article. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the writer, subject to the InvestorPlace.com Publishing Guidelines.

A former senior business analyst for Sony Electronics, Josh Enomoto has helped broker major contracts with Fortune Global 500 companies. Over the past several years, he has delivered unique, critical insights for the investment markets, as well as various other industries including legal, construction management, and healthcare.

Source link

Is BABA Stock a Value-Growth Play or a Value Trap?

I have been wrong on Alibaba (NYSE:BABA) thus far. I kept expecting the “Dogs of the Dow” theory to come into play, where underperforming, high-quality tech stocks would fetch a bid. For BABA stock — and others, like Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) until very recently — that hasn’t panned out too well.

 

Unlike Alibaba though, at least Amazon is treading water. It even ran to all-time highs ahead of the post-earnings pullback we’re seeing now

Alibaba’s issues are not problems with its business. That’s what has made it such a tough investment. Alibaba the business is doing fine. However, Alibaba’s country of origin and headquarters — China — is causing major issues.

 

China Has Been a Headwind, Not a Tailwind

Alibaba runs a great business, but the political overhang in China has been too much to handle. In October, the stock was hitting all-time highs ahead of the Ant IPO, an entity that Alibaba has a one-third stake in.

However, days ahead of the IPO, regulators stepped in and nixed its debut. That started the ball rolling against Alibaba, as China continued to increase its regulations against big tech. I didn’t think China would come after its largest company so hard, but it did and investors have taken notice. 

In April, Chinese regulators hit Alibaba with a record fine of $2.8 billion. The stock rallied 9.3% that day, in hopes that the worst was behind it. While there hasn’t been a lot of Alibaba-specific issues since, the fear from investors remains as the Chinese government continues to rail against tech in general. It’s impacted Baidu (NASDAQ:BIDU), JD.com (NASDAQ:JD) and others too. 

Just recently, the government cracked down on the amount of video-game playing that children can do. That type of control frightens investors — and for good reason. 

There’s Still Growth

The simplest observation? BABA stock is a value pick, not a growth pick. While it still has solid growth and a great grip on the Chinese e-commerce market, it clearly isn’t commanding a premium. 

Analysts currently call for 35% revenue growth this year and 25% growth next year. Two-year estimates are looking for revenue growth in excess of 20% as well. That’s to go along with earnings estimates of $9.75 per share this year — negative 3% growth — and EPS estimates of $11.78 for next year, growth of roughly 21%. 

That leaves BABA stock trading at about 16 times this year’s earnings expectations, which is a discount to the overall market. Compared to some of the mega-cap tech stocks out there and given its growth, Alibaba is pretty darn cheap as well. 

While that observation is true, it can also be true to say that Alibaba is a potential value trap

That’s what makes this one tough. If we only focus on the business, Alibaba stock is not a value trap. The regulatory hurdles will make this a “no-touch” for some, and thus a value trap. For others, the stock’s 52% decline from the highs will have removed enough of the risk to make this holding attractive going forward. 

At least with some proper risk management.

 

Trading BABA Stock

The stock has moved sharply higher over the past few sessions amid high volatility. There have been plenty of gaps lately and Alibaba made a recent low at $152.80. 

Keep that level in mind. 

So what do investors do that want to own BABA stock but don’t want too much risk? 

Investors who are long BABA stock can consider using that level (or just below it) as their stop-loss. That helps mitigate some of the risk this name presents. 

Although it’s well off the lows, Alibaba looks better now that it’s above the 10-day moving average and the Covid-19 lows near $170. If shares can continue to power higher, the mid-$180s are possible, followed by the 50-day moving average, then the 200-week moving average. 

On the downside, there should be decent support around the $160 mark. Should that fail, BABA stock could revisit the recent low. 

For now though, bulls are hoping the worst is behind them and Alibaba is on the verge of a move higher. 

On the date of publication, Bret Kenwell did not have (either directly or indirectly) any positions in the securities mentioned in this article. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the writer, subject to the InvestorPlace.com Publishing Guidelines.

Bret Kenwell is the manager and author of Future Blue Chips and is on Twitter @BretKenwell.

Source link